We Compare AI
🤖 AI Tools

Flux 1.1 Pro vs LLaMA 3.1 405B — Which Is Better in 2026?

Flux 1.1 Pro vs LLaMA 3.1 405B: independent head-to-head scored on Performance, Value, Reliability, and Ease of Use. See scores, pros, cons, and our verdict.

Updated: 2026-04-11How we score →

Black Forest Labs

Flux 1.1 Pro

Best new open-source image model

Meta

LLaMA 3.1 405B

Best open-source LLM — free to run

8.2

Overall Score

WINNER

7.8

Overall Score

8.8
Performance
8.5
8.5
Value
9.5
7.5
Reliability
6.0
7.0
Ease of Use
5.0

Our Verdict

Flux 1.1 Pro scores higher overall (8.2/10 vs 7.8/10), winning on Performance and Reliability. Best new open-source image model. Near-Midjourney photorealism with open weights.

Pricing — Flux 1.1 Pro

Via Replicate from $0.003/image · Free if self-hosted

Pricing — LLaMA 3.1 405B

Free (self-hosted) · Cloud inference from $0.003/1K tokens

Flux 1.1 Pro

Pros

  • Near-Midjourney photorealism quality
  • Open-source weights — self-host for free
  • API access via Replicate, fal.ai, Together AI

Cons

  • No native web UI — requires third-party platform
  • Less community resources than Midjourney
  • Quality varies by hosting platform

Best For

Developers wanting API access, open-source workflows, photorealistic image generation

LLaMA 3.1 405B

Pros

  • Fully open-source weights — self-host for free
  • No data sent to third parties
  • Competitive with GPT-4 class models

Cons

  • Requires GPU infrastructure to run
  • No official support or SLA
  • Harder to set up than hosted solutions

Best For

Privacy-first deployments, open-source enthusiasts, budget-conscious teams with infrastructure

Choose Flux 1.1 Pro if…

  • Performance is your top priority — Flux 1.1 Pro leads by 0.3 points
  • Developers wanting API access
  • You also value Reliability — Flux 1.1 Pro wins that dimension too

Choose LLaMA 3.1 405B if…

  • Value is your top priority — LLaMA 3.1 405B leads by 1.0 points
  • Privacy-first deployments
  • Meta support, documentation, and community suit your team

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Flux 1.1 Pro better than LLaMA 3.1 405B?

Flux 1.1 Pro scores 8.2/10 overall vs 7.8/10 for LLaMA 3.1 405B, with an edge on Performance and Reliability and Ease of Use. That said, "LLaMA 3.1 405B" may be the better pick if value is your priority. The right choice depends on your use case.

What is the pricing difference between Flux 1.1 Pro and LLaMA 3.1 405B?

Flux 1.1 Pro: Via Replicate from $0.003/image · Free if self-hosted. LLaMA 3.1 405B: Free (self-hosted) · Cloud inference from $0.003/1K tokens. Compare usage volumes and features needed to determine total cost of ownership for your team.

Which is better for developers wanting api access?

Flux 1.1 Pro is generally stronger here, scoring 8.2/10 overall. Best new open-source image model. Near-Midjourney photorealism with open weights. For more niche requirements like value, LLaMA 3.1 405B may be worth evaluating.

See all VS comparisons

28 head-to-head comparisons across AI models, coding tools, image generators & more.

Browse all comparisons →