We Compare AI
🤖 AI Models

GPT-4.1 vs Qwen 2.5 — Which Is Better in 2026?

GPT-4.1 vs Qwen 2.5: independent head-to-head scored on Performance, Value, Reliability, and Ease of Use. See scores, pros, cons, and our verdict.

Updated: 2026-04-11How we score →

OpenAI

GPT-4.1

OpenAI's best coding model

Alibaba

Qwen 2.5

Best multilingual open model from China

8.9

Overall Score

WINNER

8.0

Overall Score

9.3
Performance
8.0
8.0
Value
9.2
9.2
Reliability
7.0
9.5
Ease of Use
7.0

Our Verdict

GPT-4.1 scores higher overall (8.9/10 vs 8.0/10), winning on Performance and Reliability. OpenAI's latest flagship. Best coding performance in the GPT family.

Pricing — GPT-4.1

API: $2/M input · $8/M output · Plus $20/mo

Pricing — Qwen 2.5

API via Alibaba Cloud · Open-weights free

GPT-4.1

Pros

  • Best coding performance in the GPT family
  • Strong instruction following for agentic use
  • Full OpenAI tool ecosystem

Cons

  • More expensive than Claude Sonnet at API level
  • Less creative than Claude for writing tasks
  • Context window smaller than Gemini Pro

Best For

Software development, agentic workflows, enterprise OpenAI integrations

Qwen 2.5

Pros

  • Excellent Chinese and Asian language support
  • Open-weights — self-host for free
  • Strong coding benchmarks for its size

Cons

  • Data governance concerns for Western enterprises
  • Less English writing quality than Claude/GPT
  • Smaller Western ecosystem and tooling

Best For

Asian language tasks, multilingual apps, cost-sensitive developers outside enterprise

Choose GPT-4.1 if…

  • Performance is your top priority — GPT-4.1 leads by 1.3 points
  • Software development
  • You also value Reliability — GPT-4.1 wins that dimension too

Choose Qwen 2.5 if…

  • Value is your top priority — Qwen 2.5 leads by 1.2 points
  • Asian language tasks
  • Alibaba support, documentation, and community suit your team

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GPT-4.1 better than Qwen 2.5?

GPT-4.1 scores 8.9/10 overall vs 8.0/10 for Qwen 2.5, with an edge on Performance and Reliability and Ease of Use. That said, "Qwen 2.5" may be the better pick if value is your priority. The right choice depends on your use case.

What is the pricing difference between GPT-4.1 and Qwen 2.5?

GPT-4.1: API: $2/M input · $8/M output · Plus $20/mo. Qwen 2.5: API via Alibaba Cloud · Open-weights free. Compare usage volumes and features needed to determine total cost of ownership for your team.

Which is better for software development?

GPT-4.1 is generally stronger here, scoring 8.9/10 overall. OpenAI's latest flagship. Best coding performance in the GPT family. For more niche requirements like value, Qwen 2.5 may be worth evaluating.

See all VS comparisons

28 head-to-head comparisons across AI models, coding tools, image generators & more.

Browse all comparisons →