We Compare AI
🤖 AI Models

OpenAI o1 vs Qwen 2.5 — Which Is Better in 2026?

OpenAI o1 vs Qwen 2.5: independent head-to-head scored on Performance, Value, Reliability, and Ease of Use. See scores, pros, cons, and our verdict.

Updated: 2026-04-11How we score →

OpenAI

OpenAI o1

Best AI for hard reasoning and math

Alibaba

Qwen 2.5

Best multilingual open model from China

8.0

Overall Score

WINNER

8.0

Overall Score

9.5
Performance
8.0
6.0
Value
9.2
8.5
Reliability
7.0
7.5
Ease of Use
7.0

Our Verdict

OpenAI o1 scores higher overall (8.0/10 vs 8.0/10), winning on Performance and Reliability. Best AI for hard reasoning, math, and science. Expensive and slow but uniquely powerful.

Pricing — OpenAI o1

API: $15/M input · $60/M output · Pro plan

Pricing — Qwen 2.5

API via Alibaba Cloud · Open-weights free

OpenAI o1

Pros

  • Best multi-step mathematical reasoning available
  • Excels at PhD-level problem solving
  • Think-before-answer approach reduces errors

Cons

  • Much slower than standard GPT models
  • Very expensive for routine use
  • Not suitable for conversational or creative tasks

Best For

Complex math, scientific reasoning, hard coding challenges, research problems

Qwen 2.5

Pros

  • Excellent Chinese and Asian language support
  • Open-weights — self-host for free
  • Strong coding benchmarks for its size

Cons

  • Data governance concerns for Western enterprises
  • Less English writing quality than Claude/GPT
  • Smaller Western ecosystem and tooling

Best For

Asian language tasks, multilingual apps, cost-sensitive developers outside enterprise

Choose OpenAI o1 if…

  • Performance is your top priority — OpenAI o1 leads by 1.5 points
  • Complex math
  • You also value Reliability — OpenAI o1 wins that dimension too

Choose Qwen 2.5 if…

  • Value is your top priority — Qwen 2.5 leads by 3.2 points
  • Asian language tasks
  • Alibaba support, documentation, and community suit your team

Frequently Asked Questions

Is OpenAI o1 better than Qwen 2.5?

OpenAI o1 scores 8.0/10 overall vs 8.0/10 for Qwen 2.5, with an edge on Performance and Reliability and Ease of Use. That said, "Qwen 2.5" may be the better pick if value is your priority. The right choice depends on your use case.

What is the pricing difference between OpenAI o1 and Qwen 2.5?

OpenAI o1: API: $15/M input · $60/M output · Pro plan. Qwen 2.5: API via Alibaba Cloud · Open-weights free. Compare usage volumes and features needed to determine total cost of ownership for your team.

Which is better for complex math?

OpenAI o1 is generally stronger here, scoring 8.0/10 overall. Best AI for hard reasoning, math, and science. Expensive and slow but uniquely powerful. For more niche requirements like value, Qwen 2.5 may be worth evaluating.

See all VS comparisons

28 head-to-head comparisons across AI models, coding tools, image generators & more.

Browse all comparisons →